Electoral receipt · State Assembly
ROBERT E. PULLEN-MILES
State Assembly · ASM-62 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
ROBERT E. PULLEN-MILES · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 160 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $8,847 · 2%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $23,285 · 5%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $401,096 · 93%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 California Real Estate PAC (CREPAC) $21,400
02 Bloomfield, Bill · None $17,100
03 Pullen-Miles for Assembly 2022 $17,000
04 Low, Evan · State of California $10,800
05 Sempra Energy $10,350
06 Blanca Rubio for Assembly 2022 $10,300
07 Donald G. Hunt $9,900
08 PULLEN-MILES FOR MAYOR 2022 $9,800
09 Housing Contractors of California PAC $9,800
10 California for Jobs and a Strong Economy $9,800
11 California Medical Association PAC (CALPAC) $9,800
12 California Apartment Association PAC $9,800
13 DaVita $9,800
14 RWA Inc $7,500
15 Chevron Policy Government & Public Affairs $5,400
16 Consumer Care Corporation $5,182
17 Emi Lease LLC(Greg Nathan) $5,000
18 Republic Services, Inc. $5,000
19 Autumn Burke for Assembly 2022 $4,900
20 CarWorld $4,900
21 Icon & Ikon, Inc. $4,900
22 Golban, David · Goli Enterprise $4,900
23 Edison Internation and Affiliated Entities $4,000
24 Elect Carlos Villapudua for Assembly 2022 $4,000
25 Inglewood Police Association PAC $4,000
Primary committee total $433,229
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ROBERT E. PULLEN-MILES for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee ROBERT E. PULLEN-MILES controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.