Electoral receipt · State Assembly
RANDY GREG VOEPEL
State Assembly · ASM-71 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
RANDY GREG VOEPEL · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 89 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $3,330 · 1%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $5,662 · 3%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $216,713 · 96%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Philip Morris USA Inc. & its Affiliates; Altria Client Services LLC $9,400
02 Sempra Energy $9,400
03 Chevron Corp. & its Subsidiaries/Affiliate $9,400
04 DaVita Total Renal Care Inc. a subsidiary of DaVita Inc. $9,400
05 CA Association of Highway Patrolmen PAC -SCC $9,300
06 CA Real Estate PAC-CA Assn of Realtors (CREPAC) -SCC $8,300
07 California Real Estate PAC (CREPAC) - SCC $7,300
08 CCPOA PAC $6,700
09 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $6,700
10 California Bankers Association State PAC $6,200
11 Walton, Jim · Harvest Bank $6,200
12 Peace Officers Research Association of California PAC - PORAC PAC $6,000
13 Voepel for Assembly 2018 $5,713
14 Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. $5,400
15 RAI Services Company $4,700
16 Viejas Tribal Government $4,700
17 Riverside Sheriffs Assn Public Edu Fund $4,700
18 Anheuser Busch Companies $4,700
19 Personal Insurance Federation of CA Agents & Employees PAC $4,500
20 CA Pawnbrokers Association PAC $4,000
21 Fresenius Medical Care Holding $4,000
22 Farmers Group Inc. $4,000
23 Allstate Insurance Company $4,000
24 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation $4,000
25 The Doctors Company PAC $3,700
Primary committee total $225,704
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "RANDY GREG VOEPEL for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee RANDY GREG VOEPEL controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.