Electoral receipt · State Assembly
EDWIN CHAU
State Assembly · ASM-49 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
EDWIN CHAU · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 15 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $450 · 0%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $500 · 0%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $191,885 · 100%
Top donors to primary committee
(15)
01 Ed Chau for Assembly 2020 $173,785
02 California Optometric PAC $4,700
03 Amazon.com Services, LLC $2,500
04 California Professional Firefighters PAC Small Contributor Committee $2,000
05 Holistic Integrated Services Foundation $2,000
06 Faculty for our University's Future, a committee sponsored by the California Faculty Association Small Contributor Committee $1,500
07 Salesforce.com, Inc. $1,500
08 California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges, and Hearing Officers in State Employment PAC AKA CASE PAC $1,300
09 DoorDash, Inc. $1,300
10 PACE of California School Employees Association Small Contributor Committee $1,300
11 Los Angeles County Medical Association PAC (LACPAC) $500
12 Lau, Mei Wah · East West Bank $150
13 Cai, Hui Ling · May Beauty Salon $100
14 Kwong, Chung Ling · Mozilla Corporation $100
15 Lee, Ernest K. · n/a $100
Primary committee total $192,835
Wider fundraising footprint ·
primary is 70% of total controlled
★ CHAU FOR ASSEMBLY 2022; ED · Primary campaign committee $192,835
◦ CHAU FOR JUDGE 2024; ED · Uncategorized $83,604
All controlled committees $276,439
Where the non-primary money goes
$$ Uncategorized $83,604
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "EDWIN CHAU for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee EDWIN CHAU controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.