Electoral receipt · State Assembly
JERRY HILL
State Assembly · ASM-22 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
JERRY HILL · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 188 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $3,373 · 1%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $13,161 · 3%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $431,950 · 96%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $9,400
02 Facebook Inc $9,400
03 Caremark RX Inc $8,500
04 CALIFORNIA Academy of Eye Physicians & Surgeons PAC $7,000
05 Tesla Inc. $6,500
06 Ghost Management Group LLC $6,400
07 Charter Communications Inc. $6,000
08 Hewlett Packard Company $6,000
09 Walgreens $6,000
10 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation $6,000
11 Deloitte Services LP $5,800
12 Gilead Sciences Inc. $5,400
13 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS PAC (CALAOMS) $5,200
14 Wine Institute California PAC $5,000
15 California Hospital Association PAC $4,800
16 Bay Area Legislative Leadership PAC $4,700
17 United Airlines Inc. $4,600
18 Bloom Energy Corporation $4,500
19 Genentech Inc. $4,400
20 Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits LLC $4,400
21 Anheuser-Busch Co. Inc. $4,400
22 CALIFORNIA OPTOMETRIC PAC AKA CAL-OPAC $4,400
23 CALIFORNIA ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $4,400
24 Advamed California PAC $4,400
25 CAPG Physician Group PAC $4,400
Primary committee total $448,485
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JERRY HILL for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee JERRY HILL controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.