Electoral receipt · State Assembly
STEVEN CHOI
State Assembly · ASM-68 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
STEVEN CHOI · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 432 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $38,246 · 2%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $41,604 · 3%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $1,465,496 · 95%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 California Republican Party $765,174
02 Steven Choi for Assembly 2018 $92,700
03 California Real Estate PAC, CREPAC $16,600
04 Media Placement Services $10,097
05 Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius Kidney Care $9,400
06 New Majority PAC $9,400
07 R.D. Olson Development $9,400
08 Western Manufactured Housing Communities Assoc $9,400
09 California Dental PAC, CALDPAC $9,400
10 California New Car Dealers Assoc PAC $9,400
11 CCPOA $9,400
12 Edison $9,400
13 Farmers Group Inc Employees & Agents SCC PAC $9,400
14 OCBCS BIZPAC $9,400
15 Waldron for Assembly 2020 $9,400
16 Gallagher for Assembly 2020 $9,400
17 DaVita $9,400
18 Ca Association of Highway Patrolmen $9,300
19 Farmers Employees & Agents PAC $9,200
20 Associated General Contractors PAC $8,700
21 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assoc $8,500
22 California Credit Union League PAC $7,700
23 Patterson for Assembly 2020 $7,200
24 Schroeder, Paul · Schroeder Management Co $7,200
25 Personal Insurance Federation of CA Agents & Employees PAC $7,079
Primary committee total $1,545,346
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "STEVEN CHOI for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee STEVEN CHOI controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.