Electoral receipt · State Assembly
JOSEPH A. RUBAY
State Assembly · ASM-16 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
JOSEPH A. RUBAY · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 33 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $7,217 · 8%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $3,450 · 4%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $81,508 · 88%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Rubay, Joseph · Rubay & Rubay $83,308
02 Baca, Steven J. · Pacific Coast Bankers' Bank $1,000
03 Alameda County Republican Party · C00404020 $983
04 Li, Grace · UniTalent Consulting, LLC $950
05 Newell, Vincent · n/a $500
06 Rubay, Kenneth S. · Rubay & Rubay Real Estate Appraisers $500
07 Dolan, Michael P. · n/a $500
08 Ferreri, Georgia June · n/a $500
09 Rubay, Joseph A. · Rubay & Rubay Real Estate Appraisers $300
10 Fong, Betty · Self $250
11 Cummings, Paul · n/a $250
12 Nunn, Bob · Blackhawk Nunn Partners $250
13 Del Conte, Debra · Del Conte's Landscaping, inc $250
14 Friends of Catharine Baker State Assembly 2030 $250
15 Van Etten, Paul W. · n/a $200
16 Seroy, Michael · CMG Mortagage $200
17 Miller, Douglas · n/a $200
18 Republican Club of Rossmoor $199
19 Vallone, Kyle · Vallone Insurance Agency Inc $175
20 Pricco, Susan · Retired $150
21 Back, Norman · n/a $110
22 Sethy, Sanat · VATVEZ $100
23 Wolk, Jeffrey · n/a $100
24 Spencer, Norma T. · n/a $100
25 Austin, Scott · n/a $100
Primary committee total $92,175
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JOSEPH A. RUBAY for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee JOSEPH A. RUBAY controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.