Electoral receipt · State Assembly
JOSEPH A. RUBAY
State Assembly · ASM-16 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
JOSEPH A. RUBAY · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 46 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $6,275 · 51%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $1,500 · 12%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $4,500 · 37%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Majeroni, David · Majeroni Orthodonics $2,500
02 Smith, Roger F. · The Benefits Store Insurance Services Inc. $2,000
03 Minor, David R. · Sutter West Bay Medical Group $500
04 Rubay, Kenneth S. · Rubay & Rubay Real Estate Appraisers $500
05 Baker, Joanne · n/a $500
06 Fernwood, Mark · n/a $450
07 Alameda County Republican Party $450
08 Summer, Elizabeth (Liz) · n/a $300
09 Jean, Shannon · n/a $250
10 Miller, Christie · Sew Special Sewing $250
11 Jacobson, Jo Ann · Coldwell Banker Realty $250
12 Marvel, Greg A. · Persens Association $250
13 Thompson, Terry · Law Office of Terry L. Thompson $200
14 Regalado, Robert · Retired $200
15 Hacker, Kelly C. · n/a $200
16 Elder, Kim Nyquist · n/a $200
17 Gordon-Ramek, Eve M. · n/a $200
18 Hites, Edith · n/a $200
19 Fong, Betty · n/a $160
20 Bleeg, Paul · Eisner Advisory Group LLC $150
21 Follmer, Jean · Retired $150
22 Lee, Valerie B. · n/a $140
23 Briley, Harry · n/a $100
24 Leavitt, Delroy · Leavitt United Insurance Services $100
25 Guess, Sheila Rose · n/a $100
Primary committee total $12,275
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JOSEPH A. RUBAY for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee JOSEPH A. RUBAY controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.