Electoral receipt · State Assembly
ROBERT WIECKOWSKI
State Assembly · ASM-25 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
ROBERT WIECKOWSKI · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 48 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $400 · 0%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $600 · 1%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $110,077 · 99%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 CA Building Industry Association - PAC $5,300
02 Los Angeles Police Protective League -PAC $4,900
03 National Visions, Inc $4,900
04 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $4,900
05 Tesla, Inc $4,900
06 CA Correctional Peace Officers Assoc. PAC $4,000
07 Independent Energy Producers Association $4,000
08 Calpine Corporartion $3,500
09 Berke, Michele G. · CA School of the Deaf $3,277
10 Bloom Energy Corp. $3,000
11 Faculty For Our University's Future -SCC $3,000
12 IN-N-OUT Burger $3,000
13 Penchanga Band of Indians $3,000
14 Amazon.com Services LLC(Andrea Fava) $2,500
15 Cass, Inc. $2,500
16 Republic Services, Inc. $2,500
17 Sempra Energy $2,500
18 Straight Smile LLC(Jason Woods) $2,500
19 Cargill Inc. $2,500
20 CA Veterinary Medical Association $2,300
21 Peace Officers Research Association of CA (PORAC PAC) $2,000
22 CA YIMBY Victory Fund $2,000
23 Dreyer, Carol Wieckowski · Evans, Wieckowski $2,000
24 McNulty, Gregory C. · Axonius $2,000
25 Mc Donald's California Operators PAC $2,000
Primary committee total $111,077
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ROBERT WIECKOWSKI for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee ROBERT WIECKOWSKI controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.