PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Senate

BRIAN W. JONES

State Senate · SEN-40 · 2022 cycle

Funding Receipt
BRIAN W. JONES · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $2,028,207
Funding mix · 942 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $100,576 · 5%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $125,292 · 6%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $1,802,340 · 89%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Jones for Senate 2018 $100,275
02 California Republican Party (inkind) $76,000
03 ChamberPAC (SCC) $19,400
04 Cal. Real Estate PAC (CREPAC) (SCC) $19,400
05 Personal Insurance Fed of CA Agents & Emp PAC $13,375
06 Peace Officers Research Association of Cal $13,300
07 Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Assn of America PAC $9,800
08 California Credit Union League PAC $9,800
09 BNSF Railway Company $9,800
10 Associated General Contractors PAC $9,800
11 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation $9,800
12 Govern For California Courage Committee $9,800
13 Sempra Energy $9,800
14 Philip Morris USA (Altria) $9,800
15 Cal. Correctional Police Officers Assoc - CCPOA PAC $9,800
16 Cal. Hospital Association PAC $9,800
17 USAA $9,800
18 Amazon.Com $9,800
19 San Manuel Band of Mission Indians $9,800
20 Cal. Medical Assoc. PAC $9,800
21 Cal. Optometric PAC $9,800
22 Zenith Insurance Company $9,800
23 Davita - Total Renal Care $9,800
24 Cal. American Council of Engineering Companies $9,800
25 Charter Communications $9,800
Primary committee total $2,028,207
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "BRIAN W. JONES for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee BRIAN W. JONES controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.