PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Senate

JOSH BECKER

State Senate · SEN-13 · 2020 cycle

Funding Receipt
JOSH BECKER · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $1,876,840
Funding mix · 1,294 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $143,703 · 8%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $146,070 · 8%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $1,587,067 · 85%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 California State Council of Laborers PAC $18,600
02 Peace Officers Research Association PAC $18,600
03 Operating Engineers Local Union 3 Statewide PAC $14,000
04 Cal Fire Local 2881 Small Contributor PAC $14,000
05 California Association of Highway Patrolmen PAC $14,000
06 Plumbers, Steamfitters & Refrigerator Fitters Local 393 Political Action Fund $9,700
07 Rivera, Miriam · Ulu Ventures $9,400
08 Sandberg, Sheryl · Facebook $9,400
09 Sze, David · Greylock $9,400
10 Yee, Michelle · n/a $9,400
11 Yue, Dan · Not Employed $9,400
12 Hoffman, Reid · Greylock Partners $9,400
13 Lam, Lyna · Not Employed $9,400
14 Larsen, Chris · Ripple $9,400
15 Lauder, Gary · Lauder Partners, LLC $9,400
16 Lauder, Laura · Lauder Partners, LLC $9,400
17 Lee, Cadir · OhmConnect $9,400
18 Lee, Susan · Susan Lee, Writer $9,400
19 McNamee, Roger · Elevation Partners $9,400
20 California Optometric PAC $9,400
21 Hee, Andrew · None $9,400
22 California Teamsters Public Affairs Council, Public Affairs $9,400
23 Gerster, David · JLL Spark Global Venture Fund $9,400
24 DRIVE Democrat Republican Independent Voter Education $9,400
25 Fadell, Tony · None $9,400
Primary committee total $1,876,840
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "JOSH BECKER for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee JOSH BECKER controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.