Electoral receipt · State Assembly
MARK STONE
State Assembly · ASM-28 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
MARK STONE · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 104 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $15,419 · 5%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $3,500 · 1%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $279,250 · 94%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Friends of Mark Stone for Assembly 2020 $200,453
02 Packard, Julie · Monterey Bay Aquarium $9,800
03 CA State Council of Service Employees $9,700
04 SEIU United Healthcare Workers West PAC $9,700
05 Google Client Services LLC(Mark Isakowitz) $5,000
06 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $4,900
07 Bay Area Legislative Leaders PAC $4,900
08 Quillin, Patty · n/a $4,900
09 Simons, Elizabeth · n/a $4,900
10 Blank, Steven · n/a $3,000
11 Amazon.com Services LLC(Andrea Fava) $2,500
12 USAA $2,500
13 Califoirnia Nurses Association PAC (CNA-PAC) $2,500
14 Knight Law Group, LLP(Steve Mikhov) $2,450
15 Strategic Legal Practices, APC $2,450
16 Faculty for Our University's Future, A Committee Sponsored by the California Faculty Association $1,500
17 California Federation of Teachers COPE $1,500
18 Lyft, Inc. $1,500
19 Secretary of State $1,197
20 Anderson, Amyelin · n/a $1,175
21 Repass, Randy · n/a $1,000
22 Thoits, Jim · n/a $1,000
23 Adelman, Gabrielle · n/a $1,000
24 Govern for California Courage Committee $1,000
25 Palmer, Barbara J. · Barbara J. Palmer $775
Primary committee total $298,169
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "MARK STONE for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee MARK STONE controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.