Electoral receipt · State Assembly
TOM LACKEY
State Assembly · ASM-36 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
TOM LACKEY · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 271 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $9,977 · 1%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $21,448 · 2%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $1,211,382 · 97%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 California Republican Party $388,437
02 Lackey for Assembly 2018 $55,907
03 California Association of Highway Patrolmen PAC $18,600
04 CREPAC - California Real Estate PAC $17,100
05 Sempra Energy $9,400
06 Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, LLC $9,400
07 Philip Morris USA Inc. and its Affiliates $9,400
08 Vince Fong for Assembly 2020 $9,400
09 CCPOA PAC $9,400
10 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $9,400
11 California Medical Association PAC $9,400
12 California Dental Association PAC (CDA PAC) $9,400
13 Reynolds American Inc. $9,400
14 California Building Industry Association PAC $9,400
15 Friends of Frank Bigelow for Assembly 2020 $9,400
16 Gallagher for Assembly 2020 $9,400
17 California New Car Dealers Association PAC $9,400
18 Patterson for Assembly 2020 $9,400
19 Waldron for Assembly 2020 $9,400
20 Anheuser Busch Companies $9,400
21 Walton, Jim · Harvest Bank $9,400
22 Kevin McCarthy for Congress $9,400
23 Farmers Employees & Agents PAC $9,400
24 Blue Shield of California $9,400
25 Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association PAC $9,400
Primary committee total $1,242,807
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "TOM LACKEY for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee TOM LACKEY controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.