Electoral receipt · State Assembly
JIM PATTERSON
State Assembly · ASM-23 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
JIM PATTERSON · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 314 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $23,274 · 3%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $27,350 · 3%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $862,318 · 94%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Patterson for Assembly 2018 $275,264
02 California State Association of Electrical Workers SCC $17,000
03 California Association of Highway Patrolmen PAC $11,300
04 Table Mountain Rancheria $11,200
05 Associated Builders & Contractors Nor. CA Chapter PAC $9,400
06 Sempra Energy $9,400
07 Gerawan, Dan · Gerawan Farming Inc. $9,400
08 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $9,400
09 Shiralian Enterprises Inc. $9,400
10 DaVita $9,400
11 Peace Officers Research Association of California PAC SCC $9,300
12 California Real Estate PAC CREPAC $8,300
13 Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. $7,400
14 California Real Estate PAC (CREPAC) $7,300
15 Smittcamp, Robert E · Lyons Magnus Inc $7,200
16 CCPOA - PAC $7,200
17 Berry, Robert · DPS Telecom $7,100
18 Chevron $6,700
19 Blue Shield of California $6,700
20 FarmPAC $6,700
21 The Doctors Company PAC $6,700
22 Donaghy Sales, Inc. $5,700
23 AT&T Services Inc. and its Affiliates $5,500
24 Friant Water PAC $5,500
25 California Association of Winegrape Growers PAC $5,500
Primary committee total $912,942
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JIM PATTERSON for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee JIM PATTERSON controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.