Electoral receipt · State Assembly
DEVON MATHIS
State Assembly · ASM-33 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
DEVON MATHIS · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 103 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,225 · 2%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $4,000 · 2%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $236,400 · 97%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 California Citrus Mutual State PAC $11,000
02 Northern California Carpenters Regional Council Small Contributor Committee $10,900
03 Eagle Mountain Casino $10,500
04 California State Association of Electrical Workers $7,500
05 California Correctional Peace Officers Association Political Action Committee $5,500
06 Fresenius Medical Care $5,500
07 Phillips 66 $5,500
08 Morongo Band of Mission Indians $5,500
09 Southern California Edison $5,500
10 Tule River Tribal Council $5,500
11 BNSF Railway Company $5,500
12 Western Manufactured Housing Communities Assn. PAC $5,500
13 Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians $5,500
14 Santa Rosa Rancheria- General Operating $5,500
15 Sempra Energy $5,500
16 DaVita $5,500
17 California State Pipe Trades Council Political Action Committee $5,000
18 Barona Band of Mission Indians $5,000
19 Amazon.com $5,000
20 Sunkist Political Action Committee $4,000
21 California Optometric PAC (aka CAL-OPAC) $4,000
22 State Building and Construction Trades Council of California PAC $4,000
23 American Pistachio Growers California PAC $3,500
24 Centene and its Affiliate Health Net $3,500
25 Williams, Derek · Century 21 Arrow $3,000
Primary committee total $244,625
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "DEVON MATHIS for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee DEVON MATHIS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.