Electoral receipt · State Senate
ABIGAIL MEDINA
State Senate · SEN-23 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
ABIGAIL MEDINA · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 214 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $11,620 · 1%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $15,938 · 1%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $1,212,204 · 98%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 California Democratic Party $371,431
02 Fresno County Democratic CC $74,720
03 San Diego County Democratic Party $64,230
04 Tehama County Democratic Center Committee $60,000
05 San Mateo County Democratic CC $50,000
06 Napa County Democratic Central Committee $40,000
07 SF Democratic County Central Committee $25,000
08 LGBT Caucus Leadership Fund $9,400
09 Straus, Faye M. · Homemaker $9,400
10 Women in Power PAC $9,400
11 Hess, Lawrence E. · Retired $9,400
12 Hess, Suzanne · Retired $9,400
13 International Union of Operating Engineers $9,400
14 Consumer Attorney's PAC $9,400
15 Planned Parenthood of Orange/SB Counties $9,400
16 Faculty For Our University's Future $9,300
17 Standing Committee on Political Education of the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO $9,300
18 State Building and Construction Trades $9,300
19 American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees $9,300
20 CA State Council of Service Employees $9,300
21 California State Retirees PAC $9,300
22 Pace of CA School Employees $9,300
23 Professional Engineers in California $9,300
24 United Domestic Workers $7,600
25 PowerPAC.org Voter Fund $7,200
Primary committee total $1,239,762
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "ABIGAIL MEDINA for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee ABIGAIL MEDINA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.