CECILIA AGUIAR-CURRY
State Assembly · ASM-4 · 2026 cycle
| Interest | Amount | Share | Gifts | Donors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable | $143K | 19% | 52 | 47 |
| Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable | $142K | 19% | 75 | 63 |
| Candidate / party transfers | $139K | 18% | 3 | 3 |
| Healthcare / pharma / medical | $45K | 6% | 21 | 11 |
| Other labor unions | $40K | 5% | 9 | 8 |
| Tribal governments / gaming | $35K | 5% | 8 | 7 |
| Teachers & education | $33K | 4% | 7 | 4 |
| Building trades / construction labor | $32K | 4% | 7 | 5 |
| Agriculture | $23K | 3% | 12 | 8 |
| Finance & banking | $19K | 3% | 31 | 5 |
| Real estate & development | $19K | 2% | 7 | 5 |
| Public safety (police/fire) | $18K | 2% | 9 | 5 |
| Other named interests 4 categories below 1%: Nurses & healthcare workers, Legal / trial lawyers, Gaming / sports betting, Engineers & scientists (public) | $17K | 2% | 9 | 7 |
| Business & trade groups | $17K | 2% | 4 | 2 |
| Entertainment & media | $15K | 2% | 6 | 4 |
| Construction & contractors | $14K | 2% | 8 | 5 |
| Energy & utilities | $14K | 2% | 6 | 4 |
Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "CECILIA AGUIAR-CURRY for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee CECILIA AGUIAR-CURRY controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.