Electoral receipt · State Senate
DAN E. KALB
State Senate · SEN-7 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
DAN E. KALB · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 712 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $127,406 · 33%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $63,536 · 17%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $190,807 · 50%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Simon Strategies $8,007
02 Wenger, Howard · Nextracker $6,018
03 California Jewish PAC $5,500
04 Libitzky, Moses · LPC Real Estate Corporation $5,500
05 Golden, Daniel · Bausch Health $5,500
06 Golden, Ethan · n/a $5,500
07 Mark, Melvyn · n/a $5,500
08 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 595 PAC Small Contributor Committee $5,000
09 Vetter, Jennifer Riggs · Oakland Public Education Fund $5,000
10 Keshmiri, Maryam · Maryam Keshmiri $4,779
11 Schmier, Kenneth · Kenneth Schmier $4,500
12 Hawthorn, Paula · n/a $4,500
13 Josh Becker for Senate 2024 $4,000
14 Kos, Diana · n/a $4,000
15 Sunrun, Inc. $4,000
16 Schwartz, Lynda Levine · n/a $3,750
17 Yerushalmi, Rivka · Rivka Yerushalmi $3,069
18 Scott, Sara · n/a $3,000
19 Silverwood, James · Affirmed Housing $3,000
20 Wright, Morris · BBI Construction $3,000
21 Abuyen, Stephanie · Buckley Patchen $3,000
22 Foster, Sabrina · n/a $3,000
23 Friedman, Robert · n/a $3,000
24 Buffy Wicks for Assembly 2024 $3,000
25 Schwartz, Mark · Mark Schwartz $2,750
Primary committee total $381,749
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "DAN E. KALB for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee DAN E. KALB controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.