PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

BURTON BRINK

State Assembly · ASM-49 · 2020 cycle

Funding Receipt
BURTON BRINK · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $44,033
Funding mix · 146 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $21,059 · 48%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $4,474 · 10%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $18,500 · 42%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Assn (LACPPOA) $4,000
02 Hsieh, Paul · Paradigm Health & Wellness $4,000
03 Association for LA Deputy Sheriffs PAC $2,500
04 Amundson, Peter M. · Minuteman Transport Inc $2,000
05 Wan, Zhixia · Fuller Enterprise USA Inc $2,000
06 GCI, Inc $1,500
07 Liu, Fenglan · Law Office of Fenglan Liu $1,300
08 VTM Enterprise LLC $1,000
09 Nee, Christopher · County of Los Angeles $1,000
10 Life Plaza Center LLC - Matthew Lin $1,000
11 49th Assembly district Republican Party Central Comm $700
12 Lindquist, Alan · Retired $600
13 Bilar, David · County of Los Angeles $549
14 Wiltshire, Jonna · None $500
15 Yu, Stephen · Retired $500
16 Early, Eric · Early Sullivan $500
17 Welk, Lawrence · Angel City Air $500
18 Zhang, Xiaolan · J. P. Morgan $500
19 Grand Funding Network Inc $500
20 Acosta, Carmen · None $415
21 Potras, Jeraldine L. · None $400
22 Romanisky, Andy · None $350
23 Hansen, M. E. · None $300
24 Laing, Thomas · None $300
25 Marner, Donna M. · None $300
Primary committee total $44,033
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "BURTON BRINK for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee BURTON BRINK controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.