COTTIE PETRIE-NORRIS
State Assembly · ASM-73 · 2026 cycle
| Interest | Amount | Share | Gifts | Donors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate / party transfers | $1.12M | 49% | 5 | 4 |
| Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable | $288K | 13% | 140 | 108 |
| Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable | $244K | 11% | 108 | 99 |
| Building trades / construction labor | $138K | 6% | 23 | 21 |
| Other named interests 9 categories below 1%: Real estate & development, Entertainment & media, Agriculture, Construction & contractors, Teachers & education, Other labor unions, Nurses & healthcare workers, Gaming / sports betting, Engineers & scientists (public) | $107K | 5% | 48 | 39 |
| Healthcare / pharma / medical | $91K | 4% | 34 | 20 |
| Energy & utilities | $77K | 3% | 28 | 18 |
| Finance & banking | $64K | 3% | 41 | 11 |
| Public safety (police/fire) | $44K | 2% | 21 | 12 |
| Tribal governments / gaming | $41K | 2% | 12 | 10 |
| Legal / trial lawyers | $27K | 1% | 11 | 10 |
| Business & trade groups | $23K | 1% | 7 | 4 |
Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "COTTIE PETRIE-NORRIS for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee COTTIE PETRIE-NORRIS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.