Electoral receipt · State Assembly
MARIA ESTRADA
State Assembly · ASM-63 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
MARIA ESTRADA · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 53 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,845 · 63%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $858 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $2,000 · 26%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 CRUISE, MAUREEN · LAW OFFICE $2,000
02 Yamanaka, Yosh · retired $1,063
03 Recendez, Denis · Pomona College $808
04 Mercado, Anthony · Pasadena Unified School District $657
05 Castillo, Elizabeth · Long Beach Memorial Hospital $304
06 Holloway, Aaron · None $209
07 Beckles, Jovanka · Contra Costa County $208
08 Acree-Paez, Karena · Jewell Stewart & Pratt $200
09 Pi?on, Joseph · Reconstruction Experts $160
10 Cervantes, Michael · UC Berkeley $149
11 Sikora, Keith Anthony · massage therapist / cold compression therapy technician $116
12 tibbetts, virginia · retired $104
13 Flores, Josephine · LAUSD $104
14 Ring, Wendy · Retired $104
15 Klein, David · Cal State Northridge $104
16 Havice, Sally · Cerritos College $100
17 Martinez, Mia · SSG $84
18 Cortes, Rodolfo · NSF $84
19 Cohen, Melanie · retired $57
20 Iannello, Jaci · Seeman Holtz $54
21 Jung, Bob · Google $54
22 Huerta, Henry · retired $54
23 Ramirez, Gabriel · City of Baldwin Park $53
24 JAMES, ANDREW · Aquent $53
25 Gibson, Robin · artisan $53
Primary committee total $7,703
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "MARIA ESTRADA for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee MARIA ESTRADA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.