Electoral receipt · State Senate
MICHAEL BROWNRIGG
State Senate · SEN-13 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
MICHAEL BROWNRIGG · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 514 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $62,374 · 7%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $61,474 · 7%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $820,259 · 87%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Brownrigg, Michael G. · Middle Bridge Capital $448,720
02 Edson, Gary · Global Development Incubator $9,400
03 Lewis, Philip S. C. · n/a $9,400
04 Lovelace, Lillian · n/a $9,400
05 Bicknell, Craig · n/a $9,400
06 Lovelace, Anahita · Anahita Lovelace $9,400
07 Burchell, Mary · Legacy Health $9,400
08 Moseley, Colin · Green Diamond Resource Company $9,400
09 Veech, James · n/a $9,400
10 Dillon, Christopher · Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP $9,300
11 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 617 PAC $9,300
12 Brownrigg, Linda L. · n/a $8,800
13 Brownrigg, Valerie · n/a $8,800
14 Burchell, Margaret · n/a $8,800
15 LeDorze, Juliet · n/a $8,800
16 Lovelace, Jeffrey · n/a $8,800
17 Minana, Alicia · Alicia Minana $8,800
18 Rosenberg, Jonathan · Google $8,800
19 Sears, Cynthia · n/a $8,800
20 Sears, Olivia · Olivia Sears $8,800
21 Brownrigg, Sylvia Alderyn · Sylvia Alderyn Brownrigg $8,010
22 Dewey, Jr., Richard R. · Dewey Land Company, Inc. $6,000
23 Buckley, Wendy · n/a $5,599
24 Wettan, Howard · Visa U.S.A, Inc. $5,500
25 Putnam, Kent · Putnam Automotive $5,425
Primary committee total $944,107
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "MICHAEL BROWNRIGG for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee MICHAEL BROWNRIGG controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.