PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Senate

ANN RAVEL

State Senate · SEN-15 · 2020 cycle

Funding Receipt
ANN RAVEL · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $1,263,695
Funding mix · 1,341 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $233,078 · 18%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $140,685 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $889,932 · 70%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Northern California Carpenters Regional Council Small Contributor Committee $18,600
02 Miller, Paul · n/a $9,700
03 Personal Insurance Federation of California Agents & Employees PAC $9,400
04 Heerwagen, James · n/a $9,400
05 Alexander, Richard · Alexander Law Group $9,400
06 Delaney, Quinn · n/a $9,400
07 Fund Her PAC $9,400
08 Lauder, Laura · Lauder Partners, LLC $9,400
09 Consumer Attorney's PAC $9,400
10 Hoffman, Reid · Greylock Partners $9,400
11 Koen, Peggy A. · n/a $9,400
12 Pearl, Barbara · n/a $9,400
13 ChamberPAC Small Contributor Committee $9,300
14 Koen, Philip J. · Intermedia $8,700
15 American Property Casualty Insurance Association California PAC $8,200
16 Morgan, Rebecca Q. · n/a $7,900
17 Pipkin, Elizabeth · McManis Faulkner $6,700
18 Welinsky, Howard · n/a $6,700
19 PrivacyPac: Naral Pro-Choice California $6,664
20 Rusche, Arlene · n/a $6,150
21 Kamran, Linda · n/a $6,000
22 Smullen, Dorothea · n/a $6,000
23 California Jewish PAC $5,700
24 Jurvetson, Karla · Karla Jurvetson $5,700
25 Avis, Greg · Bangtail Partners $5,000
Primary committee total $1,263,695
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "ANN RAVEL for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee ANN RAVEL controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.