PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

JUNE YANG CUTTER

State Assembly · ASM-76 · 2022 cycle

Funding Receipt
JUNE YANG CUTTER · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $200,052
Funding mix · 223 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $28,063 · 14%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $18,689 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $153,300 · 77%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Cutter for Assembly 2020 $21,600
02 Nelson, Jimmie P. · Retired $4,900
03 Heath Flora for Assembly $4,900
04 Nelson, Laura M. · Laura M. Nelson $4,900
05 Sudberry Jr., Thomas W. · Sudberry Properties $4,900
06 Davis, Steven · Retired $4,900
07 Xu, Jihe · Kaiser Permanente $4,900
08 Brown, Thomas · Sierra Pacific West, Inc. $4,900
09 Ostrem, William · Retired $4,900
10 Sit, Michelle · None $4,900
11 Sandstrom, Scot · New Pointe $4,900
12 Gallagher for Assembly 2022 $4,900
13 Vince Fong for Assembly 2022 $4,900
14 Republican State Leadership Committee $4,900
15 Taag Industries Corp $4,000
16 Smargon, Daniel · Retired $2,500
17 Hughes, Richard · Richard Hughes $2,500
18 Choi, Chanwon · Ladera Acupuncture $2,500
19 Reden & Reden-Justin Reden $2,500
20 Sullivan, Robert Sully · Loft100 Studios $2,500
21 Wells, Lloyd · Lloyd Wells Gift Trust $2,450
22 Wells, Lynn · Blue Apple Ranch $2,450
23 Pedder, David · Pedder Auto Group $2,450
24 Pedder, Elisabeth · Pedder Auto Group $2,450
25 Austin, Steve · Swenson Advisors $2,300
Primary committee total $200,052
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JUNE YANG CUTTER for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee JUNE YANG CUTTER controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.