Electoral receipt · State Assembly
SARAH K. DAVIS
State Assembly · ASM-78 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
SARAH K. DAVIS · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 205 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $43,106 · 33%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $14,074 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $72,346 · 56%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Davis, Robert · None $9,499
02 Davis, Taylor · None $9,400
03 Davis, Antonia · Self: Antonia Davis $9,400
04 Greenwood, Annette · None $9,400
05 Davis, Beatrice · None $9,400
06 Davis, Jessica · BDO USA, LLP $9,400
07 Greenwood, John · General Atomics $8,400
08 Haak, Jennifer · None $5,300
09 Black, Laurie Jill · LJ Black Consulting $2,500
10 Marcelline, Tosi · Birthstream Midwifery Services $2,350
11 Sullivan, Martha · Apply Liberally Enterprises LLC $2,000
12 Politica Campaign Treasury $1,950
13 Schwab, Nichole · So Cal Permanente Medical Group $1,525
14 Pontau, Arthur · None $1,500
15 Beitscher, Kathy · None $1,450
16 Winterstein, Thiago · Young Musicians Foundation $1,350
17 Goodman, Marea · Self: Restore Midwifery $1,300
18 McCollum, James · None $1,300
19 Phipps, Melanie · CA Health Corps $1,225
20 Giesing, Patricia · None $1,200
21 Johnson, Barbara · None $1,100
22 Pontau, Donna · None $1,000
23 Holland, Christine · None $900
24 Barrie, Rosana · Qualcomm $900
25 Mcconnell, Michael · None $900
Primary committee total $129,526
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "SARAH K. DAVIS for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee SARAH K. DAVIS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.