Electoral receipt · State Assembly
KELLY ERNBY
State Assembly · ASM-74 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
KELLY ERNBY · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 248 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $28,687 · 15%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $26,000 · 14%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $132,883 · 71%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Meyer, Colleen · None $4,750
02 Steeves, Kenneth A. · None $4,700
03 Steeves, Susan · None $4,700
04 Labash, Lily · OC Real Estate Advisors $4,700
05 Laird, Edwin · None $4,700
06 Vince Fong for Assembly 2020 $4,700
07 Beltcher, Kurt · STAJets $4,700
08 Ford & Diulio PC $4,700
09 Crossley, Robert A. · Robert A. Crossley $4,700
10 Atinizian, Arthur · Upfront, Inc $4,700
11 Williams, Mark D. · Gratitude Lodge $4,700
12 Silva for Senate 2022 $4,525
13 Loewen, Robert W. · Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher $4,500
14 Wahler, Richard · Richard Wahler $3,250
15 Ginex-Orinion, Lori G. · Aviso Legal Group $3,216
16 Moloney, James · Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher $3,000
17 Moloney, Erin · None $3,000
18 Cancellieri, Jack · Legacy Produce $3,000
19 Lam, Linda D. · Aviso Legal Group $2,716
20 Code 4 Media Group, Inc $2,500
21 Manakides, Thomas · Thomas Manakides, Attorney at Law $2,500
22 Jordan, Damien M. · None $2,500
23 Jordan, Yvonne · None $2,500
24 Smith, Larry T. · MHI Realty Company $2,500
25 Wilder, Stacey · None $2,300
Primary committee total $187,570
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "KELLY ERNBY for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee KELLY ERNBY controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.