Electoral receipt · State Senate
CRISTINA S. PURACI
State Senate · SEN-23 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
CRISTINA S. PURACI · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 49 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $8,290 · 36%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $2,500 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $12,500 · 54%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Puraci, Cristina · Colton Unified School District $6,000
02 Diligianis, David · Elite Custom Painting & Cabinet Refini $2,000
03 Cocan, Tamara · Riverside County $1,860
04 Puraci, Sebastian · Redlands Unified School District $1,500
05 Seuylemezian, Erica · Horace Mann $1,500
06 Furdui, Petru · Self-employed $1,000
07 Barich, Paul · Barich and Associates $1,000
08 Buster, William R. · WCBuster Inc. $1,000
09 Sana, Christian · Self-employed $500
10 DiLorenzo, Daniel · LLU $500
11 Duran Weber, Ophelia · Retired $380
12 Furdui, Rodica · Self-employed $300
13 Covaci, Gabe · Tabor Romanian Church $300
14 Capestany, Robynn · Homemaker $250
15 Rappaport, Michael · Self-employed $250
16 Barnhardt, Richard · Epic Management $250
17 Balan, Daniela · Self-employed $200
18 Capalna, Sergiu · Molly Wood Garden Design $200
19 Dejeu, Manuil · European Auto Repair $200
20 Farcas, Doina · Retired $200
21 Grozav, Daniel · Self-employed $200
22 Nichols, Cornelia · Retired $200
23 Puraci, Ligia · Colton Unified School District $200
24 Rapid Transport Express LLC $200
25 Rocas, Nicolae · Self-employed $200
Primary committee total $23,290
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "CRISTINA S. PURACI for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee CRISTINA S. PURACI controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.