Electoral receipt · State Assembly
ELIZABETH BETANCOURT
State Assembly · ASM-1 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
ELIZABETH BETANCOURT · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 45 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $6,193 · 43%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $1,500 · 10%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $6,796 · 47%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Service Employees International Union United Healthcare Workers West PAC Small Contributor Committee $2,046
02 UAW Region 8 Western States PAC $2,000
03 Democratic Central Committee of Shasta County $1,500
04 California Federation of Teachers COPE Small Contributor Committee $1,250
05 Miller, Carolyn J. · n/a $625
06 Plumas County Democratic Central Committee $500
07 Stratte-McClure, Joel · n/a $500
08 Tahoe-Truckee Democratic Club $500
09 Wiberg, Mary · n/a $400
10 Dayton, Lang · n/a $325
11 Abbe, Jenny · Jenny Abbe $250
12 CD1 Alliance Action $250
13 National Women's Political Caucus of California PAC $250
14 Weale, Susan · n/a $250
15 Firpo, Thomas · n/a $225
16 Kleven, Karen · n/a $205
17 Martin, Larry · n/a $200
18 Minett, Peter · n/a $185
19 Van Diest, Ray · n/a $158
20 Belgeri, Robert · n/a $150
21 Beaton, Rod · n/a $130
22 Handy, Calvin · n/a $125
23 Newton, William · n/a $125
24 Olmstead, Larry · United Way of the National Capital Area $125
25 Rubiales, David · n/a $125
Primary committee total $14,489
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ELIZABETH BETANCOURT for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee ELIZABETH BETANCOURT controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.