Electoral receipt · State Senate
NEIL POPLE
State Senate · SEN-4 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
NEIL POPLE · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 42 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $5,437 · 51%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $500 · 5%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $4,700 · 44%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Floyd, Alicia · Alicia Floyd $4,700
02 Breaking Phoenix $500
03 Gutowsky, Susan · American Cancer Society $500
04 Herber, Rosanna · SMUD $250
05 Steve Hansen for City Council 2016 $250
06 Crawford, Kathleen · n/a $250
07 Pople, Neil · Candidate $212
08 Yeager, Kenneth E · San Jose State University $200
09 Jackson, Danny · n/a $200
10 Lawson, Darrick · Lawson Chiropractic Corporation $200
11 Alvarez, Sergio · Sergio Alvarez $200
12 Shepard, Nicholas · Matheny Sears Linkert & Jaime $175
13 Temporini, Humberto · The Permanente Medical Group $100
14 Zwald, Jack · Capitol Morning Reports $100
15 Armour, Rachel · Broadway Sacramento $100
16 Breitenbucher, Jackelyne · n/a $100
17 Catalano, Sam · n/a $100
18 Do, Lynna · Lan Do & Associates, LLC $100
19 Donovan, Marjorie · Marjorie Donovan $100
20 Dorothy, Jann · n/a $100
21 Dunn, Joan · n/a $100
22 Emery, Annette · Milhouse Children's Services $100
23 Kaplan, Lisa · Kaplan Law Group $100
24 Kotsoglou, Elpida · Commercial Insurance Services, LLC $100
25 LaMills, Garrett · Garrett LaMills $100
Primary committee total $10,637
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "NEIL POPLE for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee NEIL POPLE controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.