Electoral receipt · State Assembly
MICAH JEREMY PERLIN
State Assembly · ASM-78 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
MICAH JEREMY PERLIN · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 68 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $7,577 · 21%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $3,000 · 8%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $25,800 · 71%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Stone, Richard · Richard Stone $4,700
02 Master, Barry S · n/a $4,700
03 Perlin, Joel D · H.S. Perlin Co., Inc. $4,700
04 Perlin, Robyn L · n/a $4,700
05 Abel, Jr., Charles F. · n/a $1,350
06 McCarron, Michael · MHM Glass Etching $1,000
07 Miller, Marjaneh · n/a $1,000
08 Cordes, Kathleen · n/a $1,000
09 Freeman, Jonathan S. · n/a $1,000
10 Master, William · Direct Path Strategies, Inc. $1,000
11 MHM Glass Etching, Inc. $1,000
12 Becker-Varano, Tama · Tama Becker-Varano $500
13 Hirschfield, Marc · The FOR Project $500
14 Kevorkian, Masis · Monarch Group $500
15 Lucchesi, Richard J · Andee Love Inc. $500
16 Duncan, Clarence · n/a $500
17 Loughlin, John · Ruby White Enterprises, Inc. $500
18 Torrens, Michael · Utah State University $500
19 Daniels, Luke · TRG $250
20 Geller, Sue · Grossmont HS District $250
21 Hendler, Joyce · Joyce Hendler $250
22 Honey-Roses, Jordi · University of British Columbia $250
23 Senturia, Neil · Blackbird Ventures $250
24 Spero, Laura · Laura Spero $250
25 Sauer, Charles · UCSD $200
Primary committee total $36,377
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "MICAH JEREMY PERLIN for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee MICAH JEREMY PERLIN controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.