Electoral receipt · State Senate
JAMES E. RIDENOUR
State Senate · SEN-5 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
JAMES E. RIDENOUR · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 85 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $7,112 · 11%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $10,600 · 16%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $46,700 · 73%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Peace Officers Research Association of California PAC (PORAC PAC) $9,300
02 Grove for Senate 2022 $4,700
03 Meyer, Louis · Retired $4,700
04 Zagaris, Michael · PMZ Real Estate $2,000
05 Modesto Police Officers Association PAC $2,000
06 Northern California Chapter, National Electrical Contractors Association PAC $2,000
07 Waterford Farm Supply $2,000
08 Bank Of Stockton $1,500
09 Redwood Events $1,500
10 5 Star Auto Sales, Inc $1,000
11 Beckworth Dakota LLC $1,000
12 Lyons Land Management LP $1,000
13 Lyons' Investments, LP $1,000
14 Mapes Ranch, LLP $1,000
15 Beebe, Allen · None $1,000
16 Bi-County Ambulance Service, Inc $1,000
17 Demartini, Jim · Stanislaus County $1,000
18 Jones for Senate 2022; Brian $1,000
19 Porges Management, Inc $1,000
20 Weststar Fire Systems, Inc $1,000
21 BFC Properties, Inc $1,000
22 Corral Hollow Development,LLC $1,000
23 Denham for Lt. Governor 2022 $1,000
24 Ridenour, Ed · None $1,000
25 West, Mike · JS West $1,000
Primary committee total $64,412
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "JAMES E. RIDENOUR for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee JAMES E. RIDENOUR controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.