PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

ELIZABETH L. LAVERTU

State Assembly · ASM-71 · 2020 cycle

Funding Receipt
ELIZABETH L. LAVERTU · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $45,039
Funding mix · 81 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $11,645 · 26%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $5,100 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $28,294 · 63%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Lavertu, Elizabeth · n/a $9,844
02 Women in Power (WIP) PAC $4,700
03 Beauregard, Pierre V · n/a $3,400
04 Goetz, Allan C · Northrop Grumman $3,000
05 AKB Petroleum, Inc. dba Mission Valley Mobil $2,500
06 Jacobs, Sara · Kroc School, University of San Diego $2,000
07 Birnbaum, Ron · Glendale Dermatology $1,750
08 Loomis, Teresa · Dr. Evans $1,577
09 California Democratic Party $1,250
10 Todd Gloria for Assembly 2020 $1,000
11 McGrory, John · LJMJM $1,000
12 Bergstrom, Katrina · Tribune Media $800
13 Arambula, David · DA Litigation Consultant, LLC $600
14 Rodriguez-Kennedy Jr., Will · California Democratic Party $500
15 South Bay Cares Political Fund, Inc. $500
16 McQuillan, Amy · n/a $500
17 Cardenas, Jesus · Grassroots Resources $500
18 Democratic Woman's Club of San Diego County $499
19 Petrivelli, Michael G · n/a $477
20 Garvin, Janet · n/a $466
21 Liam O'Mara for Congress $400
22 Petterson, John · n/a $300
23 Arabo, Mark · Refined Management $250
24 Armacost, Linda · n/a $250
25 Schroeder, Karen · n/a $250
Primary committee total $45,039
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ELIZABETH L. LAVERTU for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee ELIZABETH L. LAVERTU controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.