Electoral receipt · State Assembly
CATHERINE M. COOK
State Assembly · ASM-8 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
CATHERINE M. COOK · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 68 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $7,508 · 36%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $4,192 · 20%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $9,400 · 45%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Fischer, Carolyn · Retired $2,700
02 Fisher, Jay · Fisher Tile and Marble $2,700
03 Medeiros, Larry · LM Financial Services $2,000
04 Hall, Ken · Retired $1,000
05 Revelo, Jose E · SB Coin Laundry $1,000
06 Cook, Cathy · Delta Airlines $673
07 Sloan, Barbara · Retired $600
08 Whitten, Robert · Retired $520
09 Rees, Leland · Retired $500
10 Home, George · Midas Auto Service Experts $500
11 Richardson, Lisa · Lisa H Richardson $500
12 Van Ommering, Gerrit & Lucille · Retired $500
13 Jones For State Senate 2022, Brian $500
14 Luellen, Cynthia M · Retired $400
15 Vanderveen, Anna M · Retired $250
16 Shields, Larry · Retired $250
17 Meister, Patricia · Self $250
18 Ose, Doug · Ose Properties $250
19 MeCey, Mike · Charter Smart $250
20 Peters, Rosemary · Retired $250
21 Pridmore, Cynthia · CA Geological Society $250
22 Schiller, David · State Farm $200
23 Lang, Michael · Stanton Carpet Corp $200
24 Dhillion, Sardool · Mission Liquor $200
25 Winchell, Larry · Retired $200
Primary committee total $21,101
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "CATHERINE M. COOK for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee CATHERINE M. COOK controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.