Electoral receipt · State Assembly
RICK HERRICK
State Assembly · ASM-33 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
RICK HERRICK · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 97 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $11,075 · 13%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $8,000 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $65,609 · 77%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 County of San BernardinoAuditor-Controller/Treasurer/Tax Collector $11,739
02 Under the Rose Holdings, LLC $5,700
03 State Building and Construction Trades Council of California PAC $5,000
04 Big Bear Cool Cabins Inc. $4,700
05 KBHR - Parallel Broadcasting, Inc. $4,700
06 Axiom Strategies LLC $4,700
07 Capital Development Strategies $4,070
08 Sempra Energy $3,000
09 Smurda, Genevieve W. · Retired $2,500
10 Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. $2,000
11 Holloways Marina, Inc. $2,000
12 Northshore Marinas, Inc. $2,000
13 Prophet, Dana · Self Employed - Dana Prophet $2,000
14 Weeger, Peter · WB Homes Inc. $2,000
15 Scopesi, Gino · Solid Waste $1,500
16 Bain, Belinda · Action Zipline $1,100
17 BBL Enterprises LLC $1,000
18 Burrtec Waste Industries Inc. $1,000
19 Big Bear Disposal Inc. $1,000
20 Golden State Water Company $1,000
21 Saville, Ken · Retired $1,000
22 Big Bear Cool Cabins, Inc. $1,000
23 Voigt, Bruce · Alpine Slide and Big Bear SnowPlay $1,000
24 Bear Valley Electric Service Inc. $1,000
25 COMC Inc. $500
Primary committee total $84,684
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "RICK HERRICK for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee RICK HERRICK controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.