Electoral receipt · State Assembly
AMERICA L. FIGUEROA
State Assembly · ASM-56 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
AMERICA L. FIGUEROA · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 37 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $5,700 · 47%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $2,500 · 20%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $4,000 · 33%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Oak Tree Pac $4,000
02 Leventhal, Marilyn · Retired $700
03 Monzon, Guadalupe · Retired $500
04 Amith, Guadalupe · City of Indio $500
05 Garcia, Heather · J L Chiriaco, Inc $500
06 Imperial County Republican Party (State) $500
07 Hawk, Susan · Self Employed-Susan M. Hawk $500
08 Torres, Brenda · Retired $400
09 Boehm, Penny · Retired $300
10 Heritage Palms Republican Club $300
11 Novarro, Kathy · Retired $300
12 Chiriaco rusche, Margit · Jl chiriaco inc $250
13 McBroom, Mark · Self Employed - Mark McBroom $250
14 Colace, Joseph · 5 Crowns Marketing $250
15 Rubin, Ronald · Rubin Seeds $250
16 Gayler, Jason · Cornerstone $200
17 Sellers, Amy · Self Employed - Doterra Wellness Coach $200
18 Ellett, Debra · Retired $200
19 Miranda, Jose · Retired $150
20 Watt, Ann · Retired $150
21 Blachowski, Aileen · The Obria Group $150
22 Taylor, Rick · Rick Taylor Inc. $150
23 Cowne, Larry · Retired $100
24 Schneider, Mark · VertexLex $100
25 Cassity, Frank · Retired $100
Primary committee total $12,200
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "AMERICA L. FIGUEROA for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee AMERICA L. FIGUEROA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.