Electoral receipt · State Assembly
STEVE J. MANOS
State Assembly · ASM-67 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
STEVE J. MANOS · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 61 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $8,443 · 12%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $9,549 · 13%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $54,250 · 75%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CREPAC) $9,300
02 Mazziotta, John · Golden state Partners $4,700
03 Conco LLC $4,700
04 Sahara Dunes Casino LP $4,700
05 Zolnier, Casey · Derby Room $4,700
06 Werner Corporation $4,400
07 Clark, Ron · Lake Street Properties $3,500
08 Mohr Affinity LLC $3,400
09 L K Properties Group LLC $3,000
10 Singh, Didar · Tiger Petroleum $2,350
11 CR&R $2,000
12 Edrtsieck, Robert V. · Edrtsieck Development $2,000
13 Jackobs, Gary · Jacobs Investment Company $1,500
14 Jackson, Charlene · Vincenzos Resturant $1,500
15 Lemme, David · David Lemme $1,500
16 Civic Partners Elsinore LLC $1,250
17 Carroll, Michael · Eco Planet Landscaping $1,000
18 Development and Conservation Management $1,000
19 Buffington, Arin · AFC $1,000
20 Chakrabarty, Indraneel · Indraneel Chakrabarty $1,000
21 Harms, Brian · Lane-Aire Mfg Corp $1,000
22 Crawford, Ken · KWC Engineers $913
23 Cusumano, Giuseppi · Giuseppi Cusumano $750
24 K & A Engineering Inc $500
25 Pacific Ventures Management LLC $500
Primary committee total $72,242
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "STEVE J. MANOS for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee STEVE J. MANOS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.