Electoral receipt · State Senate
PAUL J. PIMENTEL
State Senate · SEN-10 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
PAUL J. PIMENTEL · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 35 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $3,575 · 4%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $2,500 · 3%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $77,021 · 93%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Pimentel, Paul · Pimentel Communications $66,521
02 Montgomery, Dennis · D&M $2,500
03 Alarcon, Jill · Pimentel Communications $2,172
04 Contreras, Anthony · Retired $1,000
05 Espinoza, Alex · Retired $1,000
06 Perales, Caesar · DBA; Caesar Perales, CPA $1,000
07 Hernandez, Lorinda · Fremont Unified School Dist. $1,000
08 Pimentel, Amy David · Pimentel Communications $1,000
09 Pimentel, Frank · Abn $1,000
10 Jackson, Robert · Acts Full Gospel Church of God in Christ $500
11 Moreno, Ruben · Retired $500
12 Pimental, Loretta · Reitred $500
13 Jackson, Barbara · DBA; Barabara Ann Jackson $500
14 Pimentel, Linda · Pimentel Low Voltage Communications $500
15 Pimental, Joe · Retired $400
16 Rivera, Randl · Geometrics $300
17 Koenen, Mark · Mark R Koenen Dds Family Denistry $250
18 Fletcher, Michael · Retired $250
19 Sumner, Gail · Retired $250
20 Buhler, Luis · Rockledge Associates $250
21 Snyder, Dolores · State of California $199
22 Costco $154
23 Lopez, Esther · Tesla $150
24 Hernandez, Phillip · None $100
25 Beltran, Lillian · Retired $100
Primary committee total $83,096
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "PAUL J. PIMENTEL for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee PAUL J. PIMENTEL controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.