Electoral receipt · State Assembly
DENISE E. PEDROW
State Assembly · ASM-44 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
DENISE E. PEDROW · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 50 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $6,522 · 25%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $3,266 · 13%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $15,871 · 62%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 McCoy, Robert · Calvary Chapel Godspeak $4,700
02 Pedrow, Gerard · Alpha Construction $2,833
03 Totten, Steven · retired $2,500
04 Kinsley, Casey · Seamless Flooring $2,000
05 Keshish, Gilbert · Kings Brass & Iron Works Inc $2,000
06 De La Torre, Peter · self employed $1,200
07 Ventura County Elections $1,172
08 Pedrow, Susan · Rescue Mission Great Falls Montana $950
09 Pedrow, Denise · n/a $890
10 Schoolland, John · Omega Technologies Inc $500
11 WIlson, Richard · Retired $500
12 Rockey, Rose · self employed $500
13 Christianson, Charles · self employed $500
14 Camarillo Republican Women Federated $300
15 Dunn, Laura · Oxnard Union High School $300
16 Nickels, Doug · retired $250
17 Orta, Christina · Self-Employed $250
18 Whittemore, David · Amgen Inc. $250
19 Jones, Michael · Retired $250
20 Duncan, Jon · Precision Adjusters $250
21 Moore, John · n/a $240
22 Standafer, Caleb · retired $200
23 Caldwell, W · Omniome Inc. $200
24 Fales, Scott · Self-Employed $200
25 Hildreth, Gordon · gb Associates $200
Primary committee total $25,659
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "DENISE E. PEDROW for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee DENISE E. PEDROW controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.