Electoral receipt · State Assembly
KELVIN DRISCOLL
State Assembly · ASM-38 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
KELVIN DRISCOLL · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 149 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $18,385 · 24%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $7,325 · 10%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $51,100 · 67%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Gunrukcu, Serhat · G-Tech Bio $4,700
02 CA African American PAC $4,700
03 Steven Bradford for Senate 2020 $4,000
04 Dr. Weber for Assembly 2020 $4,000
05 Holden for Assembly 2020 $3,000
06 AFSCME Local 3634 $3,000
07 Painters and Allied Trades District Council 36 $3,000
08 Kamlager For Assembly 2010 $2,500
09 Mahalingam, Ravi · Avasant LLC $2,500
10 Kamlager For Assembly 2020 $2,200
11 Nweke, Collins · Collins Nweke $2,000
12 Autumn Burke For Assembly 2020 $2,000
13 Gipson For Assembly 2020 $2,000
14 Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, Trans Wkrs. Local Un 105 $2,000
15 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $2,000
16 Charter Public Schools PAC $2,000
17 Driscoll, Jacqueline · The Jackson Real Estate Group $1,760
18 Rankins, Ceola · Housewife $1,300
19 Driscoll, Karen · The Raben Group $1,075
20 Kevin McCarty For Assembly 2020 $1,000
21 Driscoll, Jackie · Jackie Driscoll $1,000
22 Tata Dickson, Tene · LA County $1,000
23 Jordan, Shelby · EPW Consultig $1,000
24 AFSCME, AFL-CIO Council 36PAC $1,000
25 Jones-Sawyer, Reginald · CA State Assembly $1,000
Primary committee total $76,810
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "KELVIN DRISCOLL for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee KELVIN DRISCOLL controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.