Electoral receipt · State Assembly
DINA CERVANTES
State Assembly · ASM-38 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
DINA CERVANTES · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 152 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $18,675 · 22%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $7,750 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $58,530 · 69%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 California Nurses Association PAC $9,300
02 Cervantes for College Board 2020 $8,730
03 Wendy Carrillo for Assembly 2020 $4,700
04 Mastery In Transformational Training, Inc. dba M.I.T.T. Institute Inc. $4,700
05 D.R.I.V.E. - Democrat, Republican, Independent Voter- Education (The PAC of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters) $4,700
06 CA Latino PAC $4,700
07 Re- Elect Tony Thurmond for Superintendent of Public Instruction 2022 $4,700
08 Ramos, James · State of California $2,500
09 Carrillo, Wendy · State of California $2,000
10 Connie M Leyva for Senate 2020 $2,000
11 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $2,000
12 Jimenez, Karen $1,750
13 Allen, Ben · State of California $1,500
14 Cervantes, Silvia · Silvia Cervantes $1,000
15 Ivan Altamirano for City Council 2017 $1,000
16 Eduardo Garcia for Assembly 2020 $1,000
17 Kbushyan, Sam · SKG $1,000
18 Lena Gonzalez for Senate 2020 $1,000
19 Bob Archuleta for Senate 2022 $1,000
20 Latinas Lead California $1,000
21 Cervantes, Jesus · Retired $900
22 Ramos, Armando · Ramos CS $750
23 Carroll, Damian $650
24 Afolabi, Sadia · The WBG $500
25 Gomez, Sammy $500
Primary committee total $84,956
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "DINA CERVANTES for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee DINA CERVANTES controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.