PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

ANNIE E. CHO

State Assembly · ASM-38 · 2020 cycle

Funding Receipt
ANNIE E. CHO · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $95,708
Funding mix · 125 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $9,358 · 10%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $7,250 · 8%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $79,100 · 83%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Bonta, Rob · CA State Assembly $4,700
02 Luz Rivas for Assembly 2020 $4,700
03 Govern for California Courage Committee $4,700
04 Ash Kalra for Assembly 2020 $4,700
05 Chiu, David · California State Legislature $4,700
06 Dr. Richard Pan for Senate 2018 $4,700
07 Govern for California - Hollywood Chapter $4,700
08 Govern for California - Los Angeles Chapter $4,000
09 Koh-Wong, Christine · Bank of America Merrill Lynch $2,500
10 Low, Evan · CA State Assembly $2,500
11 Robert Rivas for Assembly 2020 $2,500
12 Welinsky, Howard · Retired $2,000
13 Hertzberg for State Controller 2022 $2,000
14 Kim, Joanne · None $2,000
15 Enomoto, Michael · Gruen Associates $2,000
16 Govern for California - San Fernando Chapter $2,000
17 Irwin for Assembly 2020 $2,000
18 Song, Nita · IW Group, Inc. $1,000
19 Todd Gloria for Assembly 2020 $1,000
20 Judy Chu for Congress $1,000
21 Eto, Gary · Law Office of Gary C Eto $1,000
22 Ed Chau for Assembly 2020 $1,000
23 Low, Ronald · Retired $1,000
24 Eng, Mike · Law Offices of Mike Eng $1,000
25 Toy, Jr., Stanley · AHMC Healthcare $1,000
Primary committee total $95,708
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ANNIE E. CHO for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee ANNIE E. CHO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.