Electoral receipt · State Senate
HENRY BOUCHOT
State Senate · SEN-30 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
HENRY BOUCHOT · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 536 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $89,800 · 18%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $52,677 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $356,935 · 71%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Bouchot, Henry R. · Henry R. Bouchot $185,586
02 Rogers, James · n/a $4,900
03 Sahabi, Ali · Optimum Seismic $4,900
04 Tritle, Lawrence A. · n/a $4,900
05 Alvarado, Josue · Josue Alvarado $4,900
06 Athens Services $4,900
07 Bloomfield, Bill · n/a $4,900
08 Bouchot, Christina L. · Goodwin Procter, LLP $4,900
09 Oubre, Linda · Whittier College $4,900
10 Presidio $4,900
11 Coplenas, Monica · Safe USA, Inc. $4,900
12 Abramyan, Arnold · Advibe, Inc. $4,900
13 Kokozian, Arthur · Apricot Real Estate, Inc. $4,900
14 Walk, Cynthia · n/a $4,500
15 Left Hook $4,328
16 Levy, Shaoul · Levy Affiliated Holdings, LLC $4,000
17 Bouchot, Ana S. · Ana S. Bouchot $3,620
18 Urteaga, Manuel · Urteaga Chiropractic $3,350
19 County of Los Angeles $3,237
20 Jones, Ryan R. · The Law Firm of Jones & Mayer $3,000
21 Nash, Candi · Keller Williams $2,751
22 Lewis, William · Assurance Realty, LLC $2,600
23 Safe USA $2,500
24 Ali, Mika'il · Department of Defense $2,500
25 Carrillo, Daniel · Encore Mortgage $2,500
Primary committee total $499,413
Where the non-primary money goes
$$ Local-office committee $736
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "HENRY BOUCHOT for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee HENRY BOUCHOT controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.