Electoral receipt · State Senate
JULIE MOBLEY
State Senate · SEN-7 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
JULIE MOBLEY · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 36 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,783 · 30%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $1,500 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $9,720 · 61%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Fernwood, Mark · Pattivs Fine Jewelry $2,975
02 ChamberPAC Small Contributor Committee, Sponsored By California Chamber Of Commerce $2,500
03 Contra Costa Republican Party (State) $2,395
04 Burns, Jeffrey · Walker & Dunlop $1,000
05 Mobley, Barbara E. · n/a $1,000
06 Moll, James · n/a $650
07 McCullough, Brian · Brian McCullough (Self-Employed) $500
08 Ferreri, Georgia June · n/a $500
09 Alameda County Republican Party · C00404020 $483
10 Sansoni, Brian · American Cleaning Institute $350
11 Republican Club of Rossmoor $300
12 Contra Costa Republican Party $300
13 Palonsky, Paul · SK Hynix America $250
14 Del Conte, Debra · Del Conte's Landscaping, inc $250
15 Dishman, Maralyn L. · n/a $200
16 Linder, Barry · Eyedetec Medical,Inc $200
17 Mobley, Barbara · n/a $200
18 Skinner, James · Gallagher $150
19 Barton, Andrew · n/a $100
20 Cheney, Richard · n/a $100
21 Bhutra, Darsh · n/a $100
22 Swisher, Marilyn · Remax Accord $100
23 Deleeuw, David L. · n/a $100
24 Bucher, Jessica · n/a $100
25 Ibsen, Barbara · n/a $100
Primary committee total $16,003
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "JULIE MOBLEY for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee JULIE MOBLEY controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.