Electoral receipt · State Assembly
ERIC RIGARD
State Assembly · ASM-9 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
ERIC RIGARD · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 26 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,310 · 100%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $0 · 0%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $0 · 0%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Brown, Taylor · Meridian Pacific $500
02 Westphal, Kristin · Dignity Health $450
03 Lynes, Grant · Retired $400
04 Owens, Ronald · State of California $300
05 Hicks, Jim · eXp Realty $250
06 Alley, Mark · Retired $200
07 Kuhner, Peter · 3294 Louise St LLC $200
08 Gamez, Laura · Homemaker $170
09 Woods, Kimberly · Century 21 $150
10 Schnase, Luanne · Rio Valley Charter School $100
11 Clements, Calvin · Kimball, Tirey & St. John, LLP $100
12 Shelton, Vanita · Calvary Christian Center South $100
13 McGary, Kevin · Self $100
14 Conner, Rochelle · Documents Ink $100
15 Gardner, Janet · Retired $100
16 Mason, Susan · Retired $100
17 Daleo, Angela · Self-Switch Fitness $100
18 Coffin, Robert W · Retired $100
19 Barnes, Julia · Latino Times $100
20 Ross, Art · CYS Structural Engineers $100
21 Harrell, William · Retired $100
22 Ramirez, Sebastian · Jacks Urban Eats $100
23 Goehring, Gregory · Gregory Goehring Attorney at Law $100
24 Zuck, Dwight · Retired $100
25 C.K.W. Enterprises $100
Primary committee total $4,310
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ERIC RIGARD for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee ERIC RIGARD controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.