PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

TODD COTTA

State Assembly · ASM-32 · 2020 cycle

Funding Receipt
TODD COTTA · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $65,506
Funding mix · 163 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $27,140 · 41%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $14,960 · 23%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $23,406 · 36%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Renewable Solar, Inc. $2,500
02 Dodson, Tim · Adair & Evans $2,250
03 Garcia, Christina · EW1245 $2,101
04 Brooks, Ronda · Sunny Brooks Farms $2,000
05 Kings County Republican Central Committee All Purpose Account $1,700
06 Medeiros Spa & Salon A.T or A.A Medeiros $1,500
07 Grabow, Keith · Grabow Well Drilling Inc $1,400
08 Joe Francis Cotta · Retired $1,380
09 California Republican Party All Purpose Account $1,105
10 Pedersen, Kris · Herr Pedersen & Berglund LLP $1,100
11 Elect Keith Fagundes 2014 $1,000
12 Grove for Senate 2022 $1,000
13 Spragues Sports LLC $1,000
14 Hanse Farms Inc. $1,000
15 Vignolo, Patricia · Homemaker $1,000
16 Premier Equities, Inc., James $1,000
17 Ritchie, Shannon · Ritchie & Ritchie Farms $1,000
18 Trigueiro, James · Braun Electric $1,000
19 Carl Nelson Insurance Agency, Inc $1,000
20 Hanford Auto & Truck Parts, Inc $1,000
21 Verboon, William · William Verboon $1,000
22 Wakefield, David · David Wakefield $1,000
23 Bennett, Maxine · None $900
24 Hanford Chiropractic $900
25 Tos, John · Tos Farms $900
Primary committee total $65,506
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "TODD COTTA for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee TODD COTTA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.