Electoral receipt · State Assembly
VANESSA C. TYSON
State Assembly · ASM-57 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
VANESSA C. TYSON · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 207 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $26,166 · 33%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $13,500 · 17%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $40,807 · 51%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Tyson, Vanessa C. · Scripps College $18,648
02 Delisser, Kemesha · Samaritan HealthCare $4,700
03 Ladd, Christa Kay · n/a $4,700
04 Leif, Carol · Carol Leif $2,500
05 Stempinski, Gabriel · Requiem Coffee $2,000
06 Elm Street Strategies $2,000
07 Mutchnik, Nicole · n/a $2,000
08 Trumbull, Patricia · n/a $2,000
09 Mooko, Daren · n/a $1,500
10 Tucker, Marion · University of California $1,250
11 Michelson, Melissa · Menlo College $1,000
12 O'Kelley, Charles · CMDTY $1,000
13 Smith, Edward · DLA Piper $1,000
14 Rosenfeld, Diane · Harvard University $750
15 Wysen, Kirsten · King County, Washington $600
16 Shanahan, Colleen · Columbia University $600
17 Drake, Kimberly · Scripps College $600
18 McGuire, Sandra · n/a $500
19 Wong, Tom · Univeristy of California, San Diego $500
20 Angevine, Mark W. · Miller & Angevine $500
21 Holloway, John T. · n/a $500
22 Karalakulasingam, Jasmine · University of California, Davis $500
23 Thurber, June · n/a $500
24 Tsai, Lisa · Reid Collins & Tsai, LLP $500
25 Naftali, Elizabeth · Elizabeth Naftali $500
Primary committee total $80,473
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "VANESSA C. TYSON for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee VANESSA C. TYSON controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.