PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Senate

PRIYA BHAT-PATEL

State Senate · SEN-36 · 2022 cycle

Funding Receipt
PRIYA BHAT-PATEL · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $142,006
Funding mix · 215 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $25,147 · 18%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $14,450 · 10%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $102,409 · 72%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Tu, Jonathan · Fluxergy LLC $9,400
02 Tu, Mary · None $9,400
03 Tu, John · Kingston Technology $9,400
04 Patel, Tej · Fluxergy LLC $9,400
05 Tu, Celina · University of California, Davis $9,400
06 Bhat, Balkrishen · Translate Bio $5,000
07 Bhat, Neelima · None $5,000
08 Lewis, Beryl · Elizabeth Warren for President $4,109
09 Bertrand, Stacy · City National Bank $4,000
10 Stripe, Timothy · Grand Pacific Resorts $3,000
11 Welinsky, Howard · None $2,500
12 Khandwala, Saahil · Alps Group of Hotels $2,500
13 Pritzker, Susan · None $2,500
14 Bhat, Prashant · Caltech/UCLA $2,100
15 Singleton, Christina · DBA: Christina Singleton $2,000
16 Ellis, Dennis · Browne George Ross $1,500
17 Hough, Morgan · None $1,000
18 Cormack, Alison · City of Palo Alto $1,000
19 Bishton, Norris · Bishton Gubernick Law Firm $1,000
20 Page, Gloria · None $1,000
21 Lightfoote, Johnson · Pomona Valley Imaging Medical Group $1,000
22 Kief, Garry · STILETTO Entertainment $1,000
23 Thorburn, Andy · None $1,000
24 Chugh, Navneet · Chugh LLP $1,000
25 Nicholas, Stacey · None $1,000
Primary committee total $142,006
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "PRIYA BHAT-PATEL for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee PRIYA BHAT-PATEL controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.