Electoral receipt · State Assembly
JOEL GUTIERREZ CAMPOS
State Assembly · ASM-22 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
JOEL GUTIERREZ CAMPOS · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 59 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $7,686 · 8%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $6,900 · 7%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $84,720 · 85%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Campos, Joel · San Joaquin Council of Governments $46,993
02 California Republican Party $20,214
03 Eakin, Tom · MTC Distributing $4,900
04 Gateway Media $4,112
05 Rosales Johnson Agency $2,500
06 Gilbert, James · Al Gilbert Co. $2,000
07 Mejia, Lupe · R&R law $2,000
08 O'Keeffe, William · SaftiFirst $1,250
09 Campos, Jazmine · CA Army National Guard $1,000
10 Kamps, John · Kamps Propane $1,000
11 Campos, Esteban · KBHS Home Loans $750
12 Ritchey, Margaret · Retired $700
13 Costin, Chris · Retired $599
14 Bosworth, Sanford · Retired $500
15 Coodey, Betty · Retired $500
16 Hoekstra, Edward · Hillcrest Dairy $500
17 Schick, Beverly · Retired $500
18 Simon, Raymond · Retired $500
19 Van Foeken, Susie · Ken Van Foeken Dairy $500
20 Williams, Ryan · Self Employed - Ryan Williams $500
21 Wright, J. David · Wright Insurance $500
22 Hassoldt, William · Retired $500
23 Smith, Stephen · Smith Farms $500
24 Williams, Sandra · Self Employed - Sandra Williams $499
25 Jensen, Barbara · Retired $470
Primary committee total $99,306
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JOEL GUTIERREZ CAMPOS for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee JOEL GUTIERREZ CAMPOS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.