Electoral receipt · Governor
MAJOR WILLIAMS
Governor · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
MAJOR WILLIAMS · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 718 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $98,309 · 36%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $29,025 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $143,950 · 53%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Sacher, Fred · Retired $31,000
02 Wilson, Jaime · Self $24,900
03 Kelly, Devon · Retired $6,140
04 Clemons, Gordon · Retired $5,580
05 Nugier, John · Retired $5,000
06 Cox, Karen · Retired $5,000
07 Gaines, Christopher · International Payment Systems $5,000
08 Ditchfield, Skyler · Geolinks $3,250
09 Gaines, Dylan · All Star Baseball School $3,000
10 Belfor, Michael · American Pacific Mortgage $2,600
11 O'Connell, John · Genentech $2,600
12 Pinkevich, Tim · SG Partners LLC $2,500
13 Smith, Travis · Square-1 $2,500
14 Bowles, Lori · Retired $2,500
15 Crinklaw, Dave · CFS, LP $2,500
16 Gianni, Michael · MD7, LLC $2,500
17 lin, martin · Kaiser $2,000
18 Small, Carla · Self $2,000
19 Weinberg, Denny · Verily Life Sciences $2,000
20 Downing, Kristopher · Synergy Orthopedic Specialists $2,000
21 Martelli, Brooke · Self $1,600
22 Meyer, Deborah · Retired $1,500
23 Petrie Jr, George · Self $1,500
24 Decatur, Rev. Chad · Kings Harbour Church $1,500
25 Knox, Laura · Retired $1,400
Primary committee total $271,284
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for Governor in this cycle (e.g. "MAJOR WILLIAMS for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee MAJOR WILLIAMS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.