Electoral receipt · State Senate
MARK ANKCORN
State Senate · SEN-36 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
MARK ANKCORN · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 27 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $3,201 · 27%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $1,500 · 13%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $7,200 · 61%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Swigart Law Group, APC $4,700
02 Kazerouni Law Group, APC $1,500
03 Casey, David · Casey Gerry $1,000
04 Fiske, John · Baron & Budd, P.C. $783
05 Klein, Michael · Musick Peeler $500
06 Klein, Tony & Marianne · Retired $500
07 Schnek, Frederick · Casey Gerry $500
08 Elliot, Mara · City of San Diego $250
09 Mullins, Lisa · ILYM $250
10 Laurier, Lance · CHAS Health $200
11 Greyber, Daniel · Beth El Synagogue $118
12 Baloun, Douglas · Western Digital $100
13 Dinkin, Sam · Power Auctions LLC $100
14 France, Timothy · Law Offices of Timothy D. France $100
15 Goldberg, William · Auto Advisor Services, LLC $100
16 Gurwitz, Brian · Law Office of Brian Gurwitz, APC $100
17 Halevi, Baruch · Retired $100
18 Katouzian, Ghazal · Hairstylist $100
19 Lemieux, Kevin · Law Office of Kevin Lemieux, APC $100
20 Leone, Christine · CAO $100
21 Morgan, Chris · Diocese of Oakland $100
22 Petersen, Scott · Law Office of Scott K. Petersen $100
23 Potter, Mark · Potter Handy, LLP $100
24 Pratt, JC · Genpact $100
25 Rahill, Will · Rahill Realty $100
Primary committee total $11,901
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "MARK ANKCORN for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee MARK ANKCORN controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.