PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

ISAAC BRYAN

State Assembly · ASM-55 · 2026 cycle

Funding Receipt
ISAAC BRYAN · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $1,169,569
Funding mix · 231 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $12,152 · 1%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $12,256 · 1%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $1,145,162 · 98%
Where the money comes from
76% from named interests
What this means →
Sort by
InterestAmountShareGiftsDonors
Candidate / party transfers$613K53%21
Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable$145K12%11397
Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable$137K12%6050
Other named interests
9 categories below 1%: Finance & banking, Nurses & healthcare workers, Agriculture, Real estate & development, Gaming / sports betting, Entertainment & media, Business & trade groups, Public safety (police/fire), Engineers & scientists (public)
$50K4%3324
Building trades / construction labor$46K4%88
Other labor unions$39K3%77
Tribal governments / gaming$37K3%1010
Teachers & education$32K3%65
Healthcare / pharma / medical$24K2%1510
Legal / trial lawyers$15K1%1312
Energy & utilities$14K1%54
Construction & contractors$12K1%72

Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Bryan for Assembly 2024 $613,298
02 American Beverage Association $11,800
03 Blue Shield of California $11,800
04 California Teachers Association/Association For Better Citizenship $11,800
05 United Domestic Workers of America Action Fund $11,800
06 Victor, Samuel · Retired $11,500
07 California State Council of Service Employees Small Contributor Committee $10,900
08 Blinkoff, Susannah · Susannah Blinkoff $10,800
09 Corngold, Jordan · Retired $10,800
10 Faculty for our University's Future, a committee sponsored by the California Faculty Association $10,400
11 California State Association of Electrical Workers $10,000
12 California State Pipe Trades Council Political Action Committee $10,000
13 Mutchnik, Nicole · Nicole Mutchnik $10,000
14 California Construction & Industrial Material Association PAC $8,845
15 California Nurses Association Political Action Committee (CNA-PAC) $8,500
16 Republic Services $7,000
17 California State Council of Laborers PAC $5,900
18 Consumer Consumer Attorneys of California Political Action Committee $5,900
19 Morongo Band of Mission Indians $5,900
20 Motor Vehicle Software Coporation / dba VITU $5,900
21 Pechanga Band of Indians $5,900
22 Quillin, Patty · Homemaker $5,900
23 Simons, Elizabeth · Retired $5,900
24 Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians $5,900
25 CEMEX Materials LLC (Fernando A. Gonz?lez) $5,900
Primary committee total $1,169,569
Wider fundraising footprint · primary is 97% of total controlled
★ BRYAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2026 · Primary campaign committee $1,169,569
◦ BRYAN BALLOT MEASURE COMMITTEE; JUSTICE CA: ISAAC · Ballot-measure / leadership PAC $38,845
All controlled committees $1,208,414
Where the non-primary money goes
$$ Ballot-measure / leadership PAC $38,845
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ISAAC BRYAN for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee ISAAC BRYAN controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.